This morning, the AJC ran a very troubling article about whether the Gwinnett School of Mathematics, Science, and Technology (GSMST) has "illegally screened applicants." My concern, however, is not whether they have done this, but why shouldn't they be allowed to do so?
Before I go further, let me be clear on two points. First, GSMST should follow the law; I am not suggesting otherwise. If the law is illogical and is not in the best interest of the state of Georgia, that law should be changed. Second, I cannot confirm my understanding from the story that there is no screening for admittance to the school based on academic qualifications. The article implies that no such screening is permitted but I was not able to find any clarity on the point on the GSMST web site.
According to the Atlanta Journal, GSMST is under investigation for its enrollment process.
The complaints stem from the charter school's 2011-12 application, which appeared on the Gwinnett County public school's website for weeks as parents rushed to enroll. The application asked for math grades, test scores, gifted education and disability status, English language comprehension -- all so a student could gain entry into a public charter school that by law must have open enrollment.
Louis Erste, director of the state charter school division, says that charter schools must offer services for students with "disabilities [and] English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) classes." I completely agree with providing services for disabled students; whether Gwinnett taxpayers should have to fund instruction of basic English skills is a separate blog post in and of itself. However, GSMST was created to be "academically challenging." As such, isn't filtering out applicants who cannot handle the academic rigor of the school completely logical as well as reasonable? This omission makes the fact that the school has a lottery for admission even more troubling:
Today, as GSMST holds a lottery to eliminate half of the school's 611 applicants, the state will be monitoring the process for fairness and legal compliance.
(The results of this lottery are now posted on the school's home page.) If there are more applicants than available slots, a lottery is somewhat acceptable provided that all participants in the lottery have been verified to meet minimum academic qualifications. But can it possibly be fair, if applicants who have not demonstrated some minimum level of academic achievement, find themselves with one of the limited admissions slots while a student who is demonstrably more qualified be left out? Even if all applicants are screened, a selection lottery is stil questionable. Why are students not ranked in some fashion and admission slots be assigned beginning at the top of the ranking list? While the specifics of how to rank students can be debated, such techniques are used by colleges all the time.
If there is sufficient space in not only schools like GSMST but in the gifted programs and Advanced Placement classes in regular high schools, we should welcome any student who is willing to step up to the challenge, provided that standards for those who may struggle with the demands of these advanced courses are not watered down. Some students who might not enter a program with the best qualifications on paper could well be a hidden gem. However, when the number objectively qualfied applicants outstrips the number of admission slots, why are we afraid to allocate those slots to those who have been identified as having a track record of academic success and, as such, highly likely to achieve the most success in an accelerated educational enrivonment?
Gwinnett County has many talented students in the areas of mathematics, science and technology. For example, in Georgia Tech's entering freshman class in the 2009 Fall Semester, Gwinnett high schools made up one-third of the top 21 high schools - Brookwood High School was number 2 - that sent students to one of America's finest technological institutions of higher learning. There is little doubt that a school such as GSMST is a great asset to Gwinnett students. One of my chief complaints with public education is that it is does not do enough to ensure that the best and the brightest are pushed to higher levels of achievement. Schools like GSMST are a step in the right direction to remedying this weakness of public education. However, such schools and programs are only beneficial if they truly nurture our community's most promising students.
Our society seems to have lost its passion for the pursuit of excellence. This is a problem that is larger than Gwinnett County. Why are we unwilling to identify and ensure opportunity for our most promising students? Why won't we ensure that those students are pushed to the highest possible levels? If we are indeed leaving the most talented students at the mercy of random chance to gain admittance to the best school to develop those talents, we are doing a disservice to these students and our community If state law is a hurdle in the pursuit of excellence, then that law should be changed. We should not be afraid as a society to admit that some students have better odds to achieve extreme academic success than others. Until we are willing to celebrate excellence, America will continue to languish in educational quality.